kumpel100
Posts: 47 Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 11:12 am
#21
Post
by kumpel100 » Sat May 09, 2009 4:04 pm
Jutasio wrote: the Run bot button is still greyed out. i did updates and so on. could anyone help me pls.
for me too but if you type in console rom/bot.lua all works fine.
Chriss join vent ^^
elroy72
Posts: 36 Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:01 pm
#22
Post
by elroy72 » Sun May 10, 2009 8:33 pm
It's greyed out because it is loading weird. It will be greyed out until I fix it. (Which will be as soon as I can figure out hoe to.. lol).
d003232
Posts: 1252 Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:27 pm
#23
Post
by d003232 » Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:42 pm
I have trouble to load my saved profile with the 'load' button. I get a 'file not found' error.
As an workaround I have to copy my 'charname'.xml file from the /rom/profiles directory to the /rom directory
After doing that I can load my profile.
Attachments
3cmSailorfuku
Posts: 354 Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:25 pm
#25
Post
by 3cmSailorfuku » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:45 am
d003232 wrote: I have trouble to load my saved profile with the 'load' button. I get a 'file not found' error.
As an workaround I have to copy my 'charname'.xml file from the /rom/profiles directory to the /rom directory
After doing that I can load my profile.
You probably have special characters in the name or path, the developer of this tool doesn't seem to use try catch so it's unclear what exactly the problem is.
d003232
Posts: 1252 Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:27 pm
#26
Post
by d003232 » Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:43 pm
No. Nothing special with the charnames. Perhaps the path is a little uncommong. It's:
E:\Programme XP Games\micromacro\scripts\rom\profiles
If I copy the profile to:
E:\Programme XP Games\micromacro\scripts\rom
I can load it without problems. And if I press save it will again saved to:
E:\Programme XP Games\micromacro\scripts\rom\profiles
Administrator
Site Admin
Posts: 5340 Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:21 pm
#27
Post
by Administrator » Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:03 pm
If I had to guess, it's a buffer overflow issue. Seems strange to me. Not sure why somebody would allocate such little space to a path variable. Not sure; guess we'll just have to wait to see what the developer thinks.
BlackGod
Posts: 53 Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:05 am
#28
Post
by BlackGod » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:39 am
An newer version would be nice!
droppen
Posts: 179 Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:32 pm
#29
Post
by droppen » Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:54 am
maybe we should let this post sink
d003232
Posts: 1252 Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:27 pm
#30
Post
by d003232 » Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:41 am
droppen wrote: maybe we should let this post sink
/agree.
I can't change the 'sticky' option.
Zher0kool
Posts: 3 Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:20 pm
#31
Post
by Zher0kool » Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:00 pm
Does this work still O.o ???!~??!
Administrator
Site Admin
Posts: 5340 Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:21 pm
#32
Post
by Administrator » Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:03 pm
Zher0kool wrote: Does this work still O.o ???!~??!
No. It is too outdated.