Page 1 of 2
Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:32 pm
by romaniac
Ok, this time I'll start the thread. After today's patch, bot stops with an error message during startup:
Code: Select all
.../rom/classes/memorytable.lua:7: bad argument
#2 to 'memoryReadIntPtr' (number expected, got nil)
A previous call of update showed a lot of output without warnings.
What did they change this time?
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:11 pm
by botique
my update ends with:
"...grams/micromacro/scripts/rom/classes/memorytable.lua:7: bad argument #2 to 'memoryReadIntPtr' (number expected, got nil)"
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:23 pm
by Sithlord512589
my update also ends with
Code: Select all
.../rom/classes/memorytable.lua:7: bad argument
#2 to 'memoryReadIntPtr' (number expected, got nil)
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:15 pm
by gloover
ARRRGGH - this sucks!
Your quest is this: Be patient!
stay cool and wait - our experts (admin, lisa, rock) will fix this asap!
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:56 pm
by _hirondelle
Nice Gloover
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:02 pm
by SpiralV
edit addresses.lua
tablesBase = 0x9FF4C4,
Thanks to Lisa for her howto ^^
http://www.solarstrike.net/phpBB3/viewt ... 490#p24490
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:07 pm
by BillDoorNZ
tablesBase = 0x9FF4C8,
gets it going...after y've done an update.lua that is
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:18 pm
by Ego95
So which adress is the right one?
0x9FF4C4 or 0x9FF4C8?
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:21 pm
by BillDoorNZ
lol...surely you can just try both???
but:
tablesBase = 0x9FF4C8,
is the right one
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:26 pm
by Ego95
Thank you, then I can turn on my computer and bot tonight
You're right, why do i ask when I can try both in less than 1 minute -.-
I need some sleep...
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:29 pm
by SpiralV
BillDoorNZ wrote:lol...surely you can just try both???
but:
tablesBase = 0x9FF4C8,
is the right one
Both are correct, so the first one is mine and the second one yours
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:32 pm
by BillDoorNZ
how interesting
I just modify the memorytables.lua file to change the beginning to:
Code: Select all
local tablePointer;
local startAddressOffsets;
local dataPointer;
for i=0,(4*100),4 do
tablePointer = memoryReadIntPtr( getProc(), addresses.tablesBase+(i), addresses.tablesBaseOffset )
if ((tablePointer) and ((tablePointer or 0) > 10000)) then
printf("-"..i..": "..tablePointer.."\n");
startAddressOffsets = {0,addresses.tableStartPtrOffset, addresses.tableDataStartPtrOffset}
dataPointer = memoryReadIntPtr( getProc(), tablePointer , startAddressOffsets );
if (dataPointer) then
printf("-"..i..": "..tablePointer.." - "..dataPointer.."\n");
dataPointer = dataPointer - lineSize;
break;
end;
end;
end;
so it cycles through the current base address adding 4 each time (int size). Or I change the + to a - to go back other way and HOPE
I think yours will be more correct if you did it with Lisa's method
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:37 pm
by romaniac
BillDoorNZ wrote:
tablesBase = 0x9FF4C8,
is the right one
Confirmed. Works nicely. Thank you.
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:26 pm
by Administrator
I'm still downloading the client (it is god-awful slow), so I'm not able to test anything just yet. Still, I've made a SVN commit with the address change you guys have reported working. If there's anything else, just post it in this thread.
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:30 pm
by gloover
Nope, all adresses could be updated with the bot - everything seems to work.
Nice work.
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:05 pm
by SpiralV
Hmmm,
the SVN addresses.lua is not OK, looks like there is no auto-update has been made.
I'll post mine, changes to previous version:
- run update.lua
-tablesBase = 0x9FF4C4, (got a problem with 0x9FF4C8 on a different PC)
-partyMemberList_address = 0x9FE238,
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:20 pm
by lisa
SpiralV wrote:Hmmm,
the SVN addresses.lua is not OK, looks like there is no auto-update has been made.
I'll post mine, changes to previous version:
- run update.lua
-tablesBase = 0x9FF4C4, (got a problem with 0x9FF4C8 on a different PC)
-partyMemberList_address = 0x9FE238,
Admin would have just added in the tablebase address, so people would still need to do a rom/update to update the rest of the addresses.
I'll commit with this addresses.lua but yeah I haven't updated RoM yet either so I can't test them.
rev 730
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:21 pm
by SpiralV
Ah sry, i guessed this value would be overwritten during an update.
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:22 pm
by lisa
If anyone is interested I use this userfunction to test if the addresses have updated correctly.
For best results be in a party and also the party leader, also have a eggpet in first eggpet slot.
Just run commandline
and type
You will get prints on MM screen, it will also use the fly hack and ask if you are flying, answer yes or no
It will look something like this
Code: Select all
Command> testaddresses()
staticbase_char: Confirmed
staticInventory: Confirmed
moneyPtr: Confirmed
eggPetBaseAddress: No pet to test with
zoneId: Confirmed
partyMemberList_address: Unconfirmed as not in a party
Swimhack ACTIVATED!
Am I flying??
>>yes
swimAddress: Confirmed
Swimhack DEactivated.
Command>
In this test I had no eggpet and wasn't in a party.
Re: Adjustments for this weeks patch needed.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:39 am
by gloover
Hey lisa,
nice idea - will test your userfunction. I have take a look inside: does this also support warlock and champ?
Couldnt see those classes listed inside.