Edit: I see you have a getModule function in micromacro, is it possible to read the output from a injected dll with micromacro?
Do you think it would be best to make a .exe to read from the dll or just put the entire program into the dll itsef?
I was also curious as to how your timer functions work in micromacro. I need something like that for some c++ programs I'm building but I'm having trouble with thread base timers but I think this is the only way.
I've got a all the info from the packets I need to get now.
- Administrator
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5313
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: I've got a all the info from the packets I need to get n
You would have to use any of a number of ways to communicate between processes. I guess the simplest way would just be to use network functions.Exempt wrote:Edit: I see you have a getModule function in micromacro, is it possible to read the output from a injected dll with micromacro?
It would be easier to just code the whole thing in the DLL.Do you think it would be best to make a .exe to read from the dll or just put the entire program into the dll itsef?
Well, they work just be calculating how much time has passed between two timestamps. If it is more than some amount, then it calls a function. You would want to run your own main loop and check for these kinds of events in there.I was also curious as to how your timer functions work in micromacro. I need something like that for some c++ programs I'm building but I'm having trouble with thread base timers but I think this is the only way.
Re: I've got a all the info from the packets I need to get n
You don't run your timers in another thread or you do? I mainly just want them to be fairly accurate. I remembered the post I made a while back about how to pause between a set time but is it possible to use this in a millisecond based timer?
- Administrator
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5313
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: I've got a all the info from the packets I need to get n
You can run them in another thread. It just depends how you are doing it. If you aren't doing anything that is time-consuming in your main loop, you can get away with just calling it there instead of another thread.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests